smatic spiritual motivational
apostolic gift gifts graces prophecy prophesy teaching ministry tongues
exhortation glossalalia charismaticgifts.com test
survey inventory assessment enneagram temperament
creation therapy
The
Office of Prophet and the Gift of Prophecy
Art Katz
http://www.benisrael.org/OnlineBooks/spirit_of_proph/SOP_office_gift.htm
Return to CharismaticGifts.com
An
important distinction, as we have said, is to differentiate between the gift of 
prophecy as opposed to the office of prophet. In fact, our failure to
distinguish between the two may be the gravest mistake now being made. We tend
toward calling a man or woman a ‘prophet’ who are only moving in the gift of
prophecy, but are not called to the office. The fault lies with us in thinking
that this is a New Testament dispensation that therefore requires another
definition. If there is only one definition, however, and has been in existence
for all time, though we have not seen it much in recent times, then there is no
reason to look for a new kind. The Spirit of God divides severally His gifts,
which He can give in a moment as He wills. That should not, however, be a
permanent and abiding distinction or designation. The Spirit of God can fall on
any one of us and we can prophesy. We are operating by the Spirit in the gift
of prophecy. The gift is something that the Spirit exercises at His will, and it can come through either a man or a woman. It
has nothing to do with their calling, their training, their preparation or
their qualification. It may be informational, directive or a word of
encouragement, but the office of the prophet is altogether something else and other.
The
office of prophet differs from the gift of prophecy in that it is permanent. It
is given with the man. It is a calling, and it may well be that men, who have
the office of prophet, can go an entire lifetime in their service and never
once speak out of the gift of prophecy. The church today is suffering from the
ignorance of blurring these two categories. We are calling men prophets who
have not the office, but who are operating in the gift of prophecy, and in many
instances, not even the gift of prophecy, but rather even a deceitful
clairvoyance.
The
office of prophet is an ultimate thing and carries an enormous responsibility.
Such a one brings the oracles of God. He is standing for very God and speaking
from God with the authority of God. His statements are the intent of God’s
heart to His people and have to do with His purposes in an understanding of the
present time in view of the things that are future and eternal. It is the
prophet who is alerted and alerts.
The
man who calls himself prophet and talks statistically (for example, seventy or
eighty percent predictive accuracy) is not in keeping with the timbre, the
character and the knit of a truly prophetic man. To determine whether a prophet
is true or false should not immediately depend on whether their predictions are
accurate. The real issue is not the accuracy of prediction in assessing the
validity of prophets. Even to think statistically is to put us on a false basis
in determining true and false among prophets. False prophets can bring a
biblically correct message, but it is the kind of message that is a routine
commonplace, that is to say, which virtually anyone can bring. There is nothing
in it that can be faulted in terms of doctrine, but it is not oracular. It is
not a message that bears prophetic weight, intensity, seriousness or
requirement. Oracular speaking can be distinguished by the way it brings with
it a perception of reality and of the purposes of God that were not there
before that word came. It opens up things as God Himself sees them, which is
altogether not as we see them!
If we
allow the word ‘prophet’ to be given to anyone who is giving predictive
prophecy or even the gift of knowledge or what may be more likely,
clairvoyance, and call that oracular prophecy, then we are well on the way to
deception! These men speak messages of a predictable kind, but they are usually
only a preliminary that one has to wait through in order to get to the ‘action’
for which we have really come, namely, for their predictive and personal prophecies
that so excite and titillate us as an audience. The greater issue is not
whether these prophets are accurate most of the time so much as whether they
are prophets at all! To confirm the church in its present lightness by their
own example is analogous to the false prophets of Old Testament time who
confirmed